Mini Lessons

Link: Mini Lesson Folder

This google folder contains lesson plans, feedback, and assessments for back-to-back mini lessons I was asked to create and conduct. These lessons were supposed to be apart of the unit I am creating for the end of the semester. They were twenty minutes each. Thursday's lesson was edited to fit the needs that were addressed during Tuesday's lesson.

Performance Criterion 7.1 states that candidates plan instruction by drawing upon knowledge of content areas to meet rigorous learning goals. This means that I am using my knowledge of middle school Geometry to create lessons that are appropriately challenging for my students. I started Tuesday's lesson with a review of what happened in previous lessons, so student's felt comfortable with the new material. I then focused on a piece CCSS.MATH.CONTENT.8.G.A.3 describe the effect of dilations, translations, rotations, and reflections on two-dimensional figures using coordinates. Mostly focusing on rotations and reflections. My powerpoint for the lesson showed that I have thorough knowledge of the material. I have in-depth notes about each of my transformations for my students to use as a reference. In order to make those notes, though, I need a very good understanding of the content to teach the lesson.

Performance Criterion 7.2 states that Candidates plan instruction by drawing upon knowledge of learners to meet rigorous learning goals. This means that I am using knowledge of my students needs to create lessons that are appropriately challenging them. I showed this Thursday by changing my lesson plan. On Tuesday I realized that I had planned too much material for my students to learn in one twenty minute lesson. On Thursday I corrected my mistake, by taking the material from Tuesday and moving at a much slower pace. This allowed my students more time with the material, and become more comfortable with it. I believe changing my lesson plan shows that I am meeting the criteria, because I am listening to my students' needs and changing my plans to best support them. This shows that I am using knowledge about my students to create an environment that allows them to reach the required learning. 

The most important thing I learned about these mini lessons is the importance of time. I put too much material into my first lesson, and it was noticeable in Tuesday's exit slip. Most of the students misinterpreted the material, and many of the answers on the exit slip were incorrect. This was another reason I knew I needed to slow down. Thursday, I spent the majority of the lesson focusing on one transformation, rotations, and walking students through the rules as a class. This allowed me to address misconceptions, and focus on only one aspect of the material. By doing this, Thursday's assessments showed a big improvement compared to Tuesday. I now know I really need to focus on how much time I have in the future, and try not to put too much information in one lesson

Resource Evaluation

Link: Resource Evaluation

In the resource evaluation I was asked to evaluate a resource I may use for my Unit that I am building this semester. This evaluation had many questions regarding the accessibility of the text for a variety of learners. This required me to look at the organization, language, and clarity, purpose of the text along with many more aspects they may effect the readability of a text for students.

Performance Criterion 8.1 states that candidates use a variety of instructional strategies to make the discipline accessible for diverse learners. This means that I must be able to use multiple strategies to make sure that all of my students are able to obtain the information I am giving them. I believe this resource evaluation reflects that I am doing this, because I am reflecting on the given resource to make sure all of my students will be able to read this text. I also reflect on challenges students may have when I look at the resource and how I may got about handling these challenges. An example of this is my resource evaluation has me think about prior knowledge a student may need in order to fully comprehend this text. As I thought about the different background knowledge required I also thought about ways I may overcome obstacles if a student does not have background knowledge. One example is ELL students may have been taught different notations, and may find the notation in my resource difficult. I believe a situation like this would be a great learning experience for all of my students. Every student in the classroom can learn a new notation that is different from the one they are comfortable with, while also making ELL students comfortable with our notation. 

I believe one of the most important aspects for evaluating a text for a math lesson is the focus of background knowledge. Many math texts assume a student has a certain amount of knowledge around a given topic, and for many that may not be the case. When I evaluate a text that I want to assign to my class I need to think about how much background knowledge they have before they read the text. If I feel my students do not have the background knowledge to read the text I either need to pick a different text, or give supplemental information. Also, If I know how much background knowledge the text requires, I will have a better understanding of what may be an obstacle when my students are struggling.

The biggest thing I have learned about supporting all students is making sure the text is accessible to all students. This may mean extra resources that will help students better understand the text. This may also mean creating pre- during- and post- reading assignments that will scaffold the text enough for students to find the most important material. This will allow students to understand what the most important information is, and help them focus on particular pieces of the reading.